Feynman lectures online series#

'Now we play our usual game, we add c that is to say, we translate the whole curve backward and we find then that it oscillates. Solving physical problems is often represented in the Lectures as 'playing a game': The conceptual metaphor that is pivotal in Feynman's Lectures (as well as his memoirs) is SCIENCE IS PLAY, which is largely illustrative of the author's personal epistemology. Object in terms of another one: it is a certain recurrent model that is grounded in mental processes, in contrast to occasional imaginative metaphors. The primary focus of cognitive linguistics is conceptual metaphor, which is defined as understanding one

A prototypical trope is metaphor - a lexical substitution based on similarity. Apart from the traditional division into tropes and schemes (as semantic and formal deviations from conventional usage, respectively), he also suggests additional categories of chromata (pragmatic deviations) and moves (a wider and more heterogenerous category embracing different kinds of strategies, such as paralipsis). Harris, who is one of the founders and advocates of 'cognitive rhetoric' as a new interdisciplinary field of inquiry. In the cognitive perspective, one of the most functional typologies was worked out by R. The classification of rhetorical figures has been marked with difficulties and contradictions since their earliest treatment in ancient treatises. Almost 60 years after their publication, the Lectures still enjoy popularity, which is owed to the simplicity of his style, as well as humor and apt use of rhetorical devices. Quantum physics, but also for his eccentric and outspoken character. Feynman, who is well known not only for his contribution to

Feynman lectures online series#

In this article, we set out to identify and analyze the basic rhetorical figures in the Feynman Lectures on Physics (henceforth FLP) - a series oflectures by famous physicist, Nobel laureate R. The legacy of many prominent scientists is increasingly becoming an object of linguistic research, with a keen eye for their use of rhetorical figures in correlation with the cognitive affinities that undergird them. Fahnestock considers rhetorical figures as 'epitomes of reasoning structures', emphasizing their salient importance in the development of science, which is no longer viewed as exempt from loaded language and persuasive intentions. As rhetoric is further converging with cognitive science, many scholars point out that not only these, but other figures as well are representative of reasoning structures of the speaker. The rhetorical figures of metaphor and metonymy have come to the forefront of research in cognitive linguistics, being reinterpreted as mental operations that are grounded in human thought rather than language. Feynman, rhetorical devices, rhetoric, tropes, schemes, chromata, Harris, we identify key tropes, schemes, chromata and moves in the Lectures as representative of the author's reasoning structures and epistemic beliefs. Following the typology of rhetorical devices suggested by R.

The article analyzes rhetorical devices and strategies in one of the most popular science books of all times - the Feynman Lectures on Physics - from the standpoint of cognitive rhetoric as an emerging trend in linguistics. student, Research and Educational CenterДЇor Foreign Languages, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, UkraineД®-mail: COGNITIVE APPROACH TO RHETORICAL DEVICES IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE (BASED ON THE FEYNMAN LECTURES ON PHYSICS)ДЄbstract.